13+ englisch email muster
How could it be Sun’s fault? The actuality that you accede it a accountability implies that you accede the alone angelic affair to do in the apple of accessible antecedent is be accordant with the GPL.
This seems to be absolutely complicated for you. It’s Sun’s accountability because Sun knows what the altitude are if you appetite to allotment cipher with Linux. The actuality that you can’t allotment cipher amid Solaris and Linux is, thus, Sun’s fault. They chose how to authorization their product, they chose to authorization it abnormally with Linux. The Linux affected had no ascendancy over the accommodation and Linux has been accountant beneath the GPL for over a decade. Who else’s accountability could it possibly be that Solaris and Linux aren’t compatible?
Oh, and nice account into what I’m saying, abominably you’re wrong. Addition on this cilia said it’s aloof as abundant the Linux developer’s accountability as it is Sun’s accountability that Linux can’t use Solaris code. That is a rediculous theory. That is what I was responding to.
I am apologetic to blast your illusions of linux grandeur. There is added to accessible antecedent than linux. And Sun has accurate that, attending at dtrace and ZFS actuality ported to BSDs and alike FUSE/Linux.
Wow, you accept some austere paranoia issues, huh. All I did was point out that it’s no one but Sun’s accountability that you can’t advisedly mix Linux and Solaris code. Annihilation above that you’re authoritative up on your own.
GPLs abhorrence with the CDDL additionally agency that Sun can not anchorage any linux cipher to Solaris. BTW GPL is adverse with every authorization on the planet but it self. The aforementioned can’t be said about the CDDL.
Since the GPL predates the CDDL it is not the GPL that is incompatible. And, again, all those added licenses that came into existance afterwards the GPL are adverse with the GPL, not the added way around. Notice that the BSD authorization which is earlier than the GPL is compatible. What is accepting added and added accessible is that you accept some bent adjoin the GPL. I accept never said annihilation added than that the GPL was there first, Linux was there afore OpenSolaris, it was up to Sun to advance affinity if they capital it, not the added way around.
Spoken like a accurate Linux zealot. Lest you balloon the BSD authorization existed afore linux was alike in college. And the CDDL is accordant with the BSD license.
The GPL is accordant with the BSD license. So what? Now you’re starting to attending like you accept article adjoin both the GPL and Linux.
Sun can authorization it’s cipher any way it wants, so can any added activity and abounding added projects have. It is not the angelic beaker to be accordant with linux, unless you are a linux zealot.
Who said Sun can’t authorization it’s cipher any way it wants? I never did. I alike said I wasn’t talking about the claim of the CDDL. I artlessly acicular out that the acumen that you can’t mix Solaris and Linux cipher is because Sun chose to not acquiesce it. They could accept fabricated their authorization accordant with the GPL. They didn’t. Whether that is a acceptable or bad affair doesn’t matter. All I’m accomplishing is pointing out the simple actuality that Linux developers accept annihilation at all do with whether the GPL and CDDL are compatible. So if you appetite to accusation addition for not actuality able to allotment Linux and Solaris cipher point your fingers at Sun.
Personally, I don’t care. I don’t acquisition ZFS alike accidentally interesting, nor do I acquisition Solaris decidedly interesting, nor do I acquisition Linux all that interesting.